-
Ohio lawmakers are considering a resolution that would allow Ohio voters to decide whether to make it harder to pass constitutional amendments.
-
Voting rights groups and community organizations are doubling down on their opposition to a resolution that makes it harder to amend the constitution.
-
Republicans in the Ohio General Assembly want a constitutional amendment on the May 2023 primary ballot that would require a 60% vote for passage of citizen-initiated constitutional amendments. And Frank LaRose is their mouthpiece.
-
Mike Curtin, a former Democratic state representative and former newspaper editor, weighs-in on the resolution being considered that would make it harder to pass a change to Ohio's constitution.
-
Lawmakers made a change to the resolution that raises the bar for constitutional amendments to include legislative initiatives.
-
More than 100 organizations — including faith groups, unions, and some conservative organizations — are pushing back on a bill that would require citizen-led constitutional amendments to have a supermajority at the ballot box.
-
Secretary of State Frank LaRose, Ohio's chief elections officer, wants to amend the state constitution to require constitutional amendments brought by petition initiatives to garner 60% of the vote to be approved. Voting rights advocates and conservative groups alike are crying foul.
-
Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose and others are at work on a plan to make it harder for voters to amend the state constitution.
-
The plan would require citizen-led constitutional amendments to get 60% approval on the ballot in order to pass.
-
The proposal requiring a 60% majority for a constitutional amendment would only apply to citizen-led ballot initiatives, and not to legislature-led amendments.